💻 platform alternatives | 🤖 "AI" and its regulation | 🔒 user #privacy | 🗺️ digital sovereignty
23 stories
·
0 followers

The New York Times Printed the Wrong Crossword Grid Last Sunday, and I Find That Timing Serendipitous

1 Comment and 2 Shares

The New York Times PR account, on Twitter/X a week ago:

Sunday’s crossword puzzle in the print edition of The New York Times Magazine contains a grid that does not match the clues. The correct version of the puzzle can be found in the news section of Sunday’s print edition of The Times. The puzzle on our app is correct.

Maggie Duffy, writing for Vulture:

Some solvers who, like Wegener’s wife, complete the Sunday puzzle in the print magazine (often with pen) complained on crossword forums and social media, saying they were “nearly in tears,” some with fears of “sudden onset dementia” or, worse yet, ineptitude.

For Irene Papoulis, a former writing instructor at Trinity College, the puzzle is typically a source of pride. “It didn’t even occur to me that it could be their mistake,” she told me. “I just blamed myself.” When Mike McFadden, in New Jersey, couldn’t crack it, he had a similar reaction. “I thought something was wrong with me,” he told me. “I didn’t think that they would have an error.” It nagged at him all day. At a function on Saturday, he couldn’t bring himself to mention it to his brother-in-law, a fellow solver; he was still too upset.

Some had such trust in the crossword that they believed the erroneous grid was purposeful. “I’m saying to myself, ‘Okay, maybe there’s some sort of scientific or mathematical trick,’” McFadden said. When I spoke with Will Shortz, the Times’ crossword editor, he said the Times does “so many tricks with the puzzles” that he could see how someone’s first thought would be “I wonder what they’re up to now?

This is the first such mistake the Times has made in the 84 years that they’ve been printing a crossword puzzle. I came of age doing work in print — writing and editing The Triangle, the student newspaper at Drexel, and then spending a few years as a working graphic designer, at a time when print still ruled. There’s an inherent stress about going to press. Mistakes are forever. We once ran a headline at The Triangle that read “Headline Goes Here”. Once. Going to press is stressful but exhilarating. There’s an adrenaline rush that comes with giving the go-ahead to start a very expensive large-scale full-color press run. The stress focuses the mind.

Print, effectively, is hardware. Atoms, not bits. The web is literally software. If you make a mistake in software that results in incorrect mathematical results, you ship an update. If you make a mistake in a CPU such that it results in incorrect floating-point math, perhaps only in 1 out of every 9 billion calculations, people will remember the mistake 30 years later.

If The New York Times had run the wrong crossword grid on the web or in their app, they would have corrected the error quickly, few people would have encountered it, and fewer still would remember it. But by printing the wrong grid in the Sunday magazine last week, they made a mistake that some people will never forget (and some will never forgive).

Hardware brain is different from software brain. Software brain says Go faster; do more; the only mistake you can’t fix is having gone too slow. Hardware brain says Slow down; do less; focus; strive for perfection and never settle for less than excellence; mistakes are forever.

If his background in hardware means that incoming Apple CEO John Ternus has hardware brain, and will lead Apple accordingly, that suggests Apple will double down on zigging in the midst of a still-escalating AI hype cycle that has the rest of the industry zagging ever more frenetically. That feels right to me.

Read the whole story
TechnicallyGood
12 days ago
reply
Love this:
"Hardware brain is different from software brain. Software brain says Go faster; do more; the only mistake you can’t fix is having gone too slow. Hardware brain says Slow down; do less; focus; strive for perfection and never settle for less than excellence; mistakes are forever."
Canada
Share this story
Delete

💌 Newsletter #007 - Of Age-Gating, Belonging, and AI Being Blazing Fast 🚀 (at Enshittifying)

1 Share

✨ In This Edition ✨

  1. 📟 Short-Form Content: Of eyeballs for "human verification;" yes can I please get a venti oh shoot I didn't prompt it right; and age gating 🤝 Android getting locked down 🤝 anti-3D printing bills.
  2. 📰 Long-Form Content: Age Gating isn't It, Fam
  3. 🌞 Good News!: Open printers and repairable e-readers; the people are pushing back on slop factories and mandatory ID apps; the EU bans their staff from using AI-generated visuals in official comms; disentangling yourself from "Sign in with Google."
  4. 📯 The Post-Script: Do I belong in tech anymore?; Sam Altman and eyeballs; and how our digital devices put our privacy at risk.

"Closeup of a human eye, with a very blue iris." Image by Egor Vikhrev on Unsplash. Glitched.


📟 Short-Form Content

Chatbots ("AI")

Non-Chatbots

age verification but it's just a dialog box that asks "are you old" and the answers are "yes" and "maybe later"


📰 Long-Form Content

Age-Gating Isn't It, Fam

So. The Liberal party here in Canada - the party that now has a majority in the federal government - has adopted a motion to ban children under 16 from social media.

Age Gating isn't It though, because:

  1. it is a thinly-veiled surveillance information grab
  2. it's a digital sovereignty issue
  3. online communities can be Good, Actually
  4. ... it's probably not going to work (we've gotten more data on this since I published the article)
  5. age gating means dancing around the real issue of holding Big Tech accountable.

Read the full article here.

And lastly - especially if age gating is being suggested, proposed, or otherwise discussed in your area - The time to speak up is now.


🌞 Good News!


📯 The Post-Script

Following & Reading


Follow this blog via RSS | Find me on Mastodon


Recent Posts

Read the whole story
TechnicallyGood
12 days ago
reply
Canada
Share this story
Delete

Let's talk tech Thursday #27

1 Share

Hello again,

It's another edition of Let’s Talk Tech Thursday, which is back to the usual format, but not the usual day. We'll get there...

Welcome, then, to the first weekend edition of LT3! It’s a bumper edition, to make up for the tardiness.

Our top story this week comes out of Brussels, as they demand all new phones have replaceable batteries from 2027. Well, they demand most new phones... actually, some new phones. We'll get into it...

Also, we take a look at a new good thing from Google, a shiny new rock from China, a delightful new collaboration between food delivery and accessible tech, and we check in on the definitely not-new Voyager I probe.

And for our blog spotlight, we take a look at how you can reclaim the web for yourself.

Let's dig in...


Top Story


📱 Brussels will require all phones sold in the EU to have replaceable batteries from 2027

A quick summary

Starting next year, smartphones and tablets sold in the EU must feature replaceable batteries. Crucially, this must be possible "without any specialised tools or assistance". Futhermore, batteries must be made available for up to 5 years after a given model is on the market.

The move is part of a range of legislation coming into effect in Q1 next year, aimed at reducing the amount of electronic waste produced by member states.

There are some caveats

If, like me, you're old enough to be hankering for the days where you could just slide the back cover off your phone and pop in a new battery, I'm afraid I've got bad news for you. We probably aren't going back. The legislation requires either that no specialist tools be required, or the required tools be included in the box with the device. Still, it's certainly an improvement.

Beyond that, there is another big caveat. Batteries that can hold 80% of their original charge after 1,000 charges are exempt from the new legislation. Newer high-end phones like the iPhone 15 onwards already make this claim, so it's unlikely that Apple will change the way they operate (and, technically, end-users can change the batteries in newer iPhones). While some see this as a cop-out on the part of the EU, the other way to look at it is that it encourages technology providers to give us better batteries as standard. If the aim is to reduce e-waste, then this feels like a good step forward.

A shift towards more repairable tech

We've talked before about the "Right to Repair" movement (LT3s 4 and 8 both featured RtR stories). It's the idea that owners of electronics goods should be able to freely repair these products. In some cases, this has evolved into legal rights, which over the last few years has been gaining momentum particularly when it comes to mobile phones. As of the start of this year, a little over a quarter of Americans live in a state with some kind of right to repair protected by law, and by the end of this year that number should be closer to 35%.

Meanwhile, some manufacturers lean into the idea of swapping parts out, not as a perk but as the very concept of the product. Modular devices like the Fairphone handsets or the Framework laptops, advertise a 'buy once, upgrade forever' style of model, ultimately turning your device into a Ship of Theseus (or, Trigger's broom, for the learned among us).

Back over this side of the pond, since 2024 EU states have mandated that manufacturers offer repair services that are available "within a reasonable time" and "for a reasonable price". This new legislation takes the premise a step further. With around three quarters of people's main reason for changing their phone down to ageing battery life, it stands to reason that making it easy to get a new battery - rather than a new phone - is a smart move.

What will that mean for the UK?

Legally, nothing. But a lot of the things the tech world have to do for the world's largest trading bloc end up being more cost effective to roll-out across all western markets, rather than having (in this case) two production lines for different constructions of phones.

It's unlikely the UK will enact similar legislation of its own, especially with Starmer likely to bow to his highness Trump on the separate but not un-related issue of a digital services tax. But I think it's likely we'll see the benefit regardless.


What else is happening in the world of tech?


🛰️ NASA Shuts Off Instrument on Voyager 1 to Keep Spacecraft Operating

You know me, I love a good space-related news story. A couple of weeks ago it was Artemis II, but long time LT3 fans will know my one true space-nerd-out love is the Voyager probes.

After last year's Hail Mary to keep the boosters going, NASA have picked the latest system to shutdown in order to keep Earth's furthest object flying. The LECP measures background particles, and while it proved to be incredibly valuable in helping us understand the boundary between the edge of our solar system and the rest of the galaxy, it has now become too much of a drain on the ever depleting power cells.

We've no idea how much longer we'll get out of Voyager I, but it's certainly not done yet!

♦️ New Chinese crystal breakthrough could make the world's GPS obsolete

Following on from our story a few weeks ago about Britain's first public test of "quantum navigation", China have announced a new breakthrough that will also reduce the need for GPS.

Nuclear clocks, much like atomic clocks, are very precise ways of keeping time by measuring particles. Which is about as useful an explanation as saying that walking and driving are two ways of getting you somewhere by moving you away from where you are. Where atomic clocks measure electron vibrations, nuclear clocks measure the vibrations in an atom’s nucleus (hence the name). The much smaller nucleus gives a more accurate time difference, but has so far been only theoretical. The new crystal allows for a much thinner laser, which in turn means we can now accurately measure the smaller vibrations.

Better timekeeping means better navigation, using a method called "dead reckoning". If you know your starting position, your direction, your speed, and the elapsed time, you can know exactly where you are in any medium. More accurate time keeping means exponentially better navigation, and crucially reduces the need to use GPS, which as we know from our quantum navigation story is prone to interference and actually isn't all that accurate anyway. Also, it doesn't work underwater. Or in space.

🔙 Google to punish sites that trap people in with back button tricks

If you've spent any amount of time on the internet, chances are you've come across "back button hijacking". I see them all the time on news articles (another shoutout to RSS, which doesn't do this). I click a link, read the article, and then when I hit back, I'm taken to another page on that site. Sometimes it even takes me to what looks like the same article, but there are more ads.

If you have experienced this, under the hood one of two things is happening. Either the page is using a cheeky bit of code to insert fake entries into your browser history, or when you first click the link, it takes you to a page and then very quickly redirects you to another page. Either way, the days of that kind of thing may well be numbered. Google have promised to penalise sites that do this kind of thing. Sites reported for back button hijacking will start to appear lower down on search results, or even better delisted entirely.

It's not the first time Google has intervened to stop bad website practice. Formerly of "do no evil" fame, the company has made plenty of substantial changes to it's SEO algorithm to support good content. Back in 2011-12, the adorably named Panda and Penguin updates both tackled low quality and spammy websites by, respectively, demoting websites in the search rankings with heavily duplicated (read: plagiarised) content, and those with obsessive external and paid link use.

🤖 Your delivery robot will now offer the blind real-time, on-the-ground eyes around sidewalk hazards

In one of those rare stories where robots end up actually being used for good things, Coco Robotics is partnering with BlindSquare to use the data captured by delivery robots to improve spoken alerts for visually impaired people.

The delivery robots are programmed to catalogue hazards that they need to navigate around on their routes - fallen bicycles, open manhole covers, and the like. This data will now be fed into BlindSqaure's app, which allows people to walk routes and be given voice directions. It's not unlike how you might log a road closure on Google Maps, and it be shared with other Google Maps users. Only it's delivery robots doing the logging.

BlindSquare only operates in a small number of locations, but perhaps this kind of thing might become more popular?


Blog spotlight


💻 Own Your Web – Issue 18: Curators

This week's blog spotlight comes from one of my favourite newsletters. Matthias Ott runs the Own Your Web newsletter, a periodic email all about taking back ownership of what the internet "should be". In other words, how do you make sure that your existence online is owned by you, and not by companies.

It is both easier and harder than it sounds, but Matthias does a great job of collating knowledge, advice, and considered opinion together. This edition looks at how to keep track of content without the "help" of the usual algorithm-driven feeds.

Definitely give it a read, and if you like it for sure sign up so you don't miss the next one.


And that wraps up another LT3. Thanks so much for reading (assuming you did read it, and didn't just jump down here to the end).

As always, if you're reading this because you've seen it on socials, or someone's shared it with you, you can get this straight into your inbox every week (regardless of the day…) by subscribing.

If you don't want more emails clogging up your inbox, and are a fan of RSS (and you should be a fan of RSS), you can subscribe by pointing your reader to https://buttondown.com/willrc/rss/

Will

Read the whole story
TechnicallyGood
13 days ago
reply
Canada
Share this story
Delete

AI as a Fascist Artifact

1 Comment and 2 Shares

Comments

Read the whole story
tante
16 days ago
reply
"AI" as we use the term today is a construct built on fascist ideas and reasoning.

In order to fight fascism we need to get rid of those patterns, not normalize them.
Berlin/Germany
TechnicallyGood
14 days ago
reply
Canada
Share this story
Delete

Claude Code rate limits: Anthropic AI squeezes the customers

2 Shares

Anthropic AI — slogan: “we’re second ’cos we AI doom harder” — has a great business. Every bad coder and aspiring bad coder loves Claude Code, their favourite pile of vibe-coded trash! Anthropic’s revenue is through the roof!

Except the minor detail that Anthropic sells Claude Code at a massive loss. Anthropic’s spending $8 to $13.50 for each dollar that comes in. [Where’s Your Ed At]

Anthropic touts “annual recurring revenue” of $14 billion to $20 billion a year. That’s a very fudged number for marketing how cool they are. Anthropic’s actual revenue — that they’re willing to state in legal filing — is a bit over $5 billion in the company’s entire history up to March 9th, 2026: [Declaration, PDF]

Although the company has generated substantial revenue since entering the commercial market — exceeding $5 billion to date …

And Anthropic’s spent at least $10 billion on training and inference. So it’s time to cut costs!

Enterprise SaaS knows how to handle this — you make your pricing as obscure and contradictory as you can, and then you put the squeeze on the customers. What are they going to do? Learn to code? Ha!

Anthropic quietly removed Claude Code from the $20-per-month Pro plan. They made it available only for the $100-a-month Max plan and up. Anthropic even changed the support documents to match. [Reddit, archive]

The vibe coding world exploded in outrage. How can enterprise SaaS happen to us!

Anthropic eventually had to walk it back. This was just a test, see. Anthropic head of growth Amol Avasare tweeted: [Twitter, archive]

For clarity, we’re running a small test on ~2% of new prosumer signups. Existing Pro and Max subscribers aren’t affected.

Just stealth-gouging, to see if they could get away with it. They didn’t. And they’d put it on their public pricing page for everyone to see. So I think Avasare is retrospectively declaring a “small test”.

Anthropic’s problem is that people are using their product. Avasare tweets: [Twitter, archive]

Long-running async agents are now everyday workflows. The way people actually use a Claude subscription has changed fundamentally.

For most businesses, that’s a good thing. And Avasare’s title is literally Head of Growth. Mate, you’re getting growth organically! Bad coders want to replace their brain with your clockwork mouse!

But Anthropic loses a packet on every user. $8 to $13.50 out for every dollar in. Making up the difference by setting venture capital cash on fire.

Anthropic’s already been moving to charge Claude Enterprise customers per token on top of their monthly fee. Anthropic did this quietly, but confirmed it when The Information asked: [Information, archive]

it made the price change because under the prior system some customers would hit usage limits that interrupted their work, while others didn’t use all the capacity they’d paid for. This change “better reflects how customers are actually using Claude as workloads shift from seat-bound productivity into agentic use.”

So it’s actually good for you if we charge you more, see? Hope you’re comforted. Not that it matters if you aren’t.

What happens if you use too much Claude Code? Anthropic switches off your account and sends you to fill in a Google form they never seem to look at! [NDTV]

Pato Molina from Belo, a finance app in Argentina, has a whole company that runs on Claude Code. We’ll skate over the bit where they’re vibe coding a finance app.

Molina tweeted how Anthropic had cut off the company because an automatic system said it had detected abuse, and now 60 people couldn’t work: [Twitter, archive]

Our automated systems detected a high volume of signals associated with your account which violate our Usage Policy.

Molina appealed and Anthropic emailed back that it was a “false positive” and switched Belo’s account back on. So that’s nice. It helps when the story is a hit on Twitter. [Twitter, archive]

Anthropic isn’t the only company worrying about burn rate. Microsoft’s been clamping down on GitHub Copilot and moving individual users to token-based charging. Ed Zitron was leaked internal Microsoft documents about the change. GitHub confirmed some of the leaks in a blog post later that day. And Microsoft is moving all GitHub Copilot customers to token charging as of June. [Where’s Your Ed At; GitHub; Where’s Your Ed At]

GitHub Copilot’s always been a money-burner. But now it’s getting a bit much even for Microsoft.

All the AI vendors are just setting money on fire. Their biggest problem is that people keep using their services when there was never a path to profit. Let alone marginal profit.

What can you, the professional vibe coder, do about this sort of corporate mistreatment? Learn to code? You’re going to have to!

Read the whole story
TechnicallyGood
14 days ago
reply
Canada
Share this story
Delete

Objection AI: venture capital tries to block bad press

2 Shares

Our good friends the billionaires, and especially the venture capitalists, see journalism only as a channel for promoting their ideas outward. It’s never meant to come back toward them.

But the press keeps talking about them and the things they’re doing. Perhaps we can fix this terrible issue using AI!

Here’s Objection AI — your “AI Judge for Investigating Media Claims”! [press release]

The pitch is that it’s hard for rich guys, er, ordinary people, to hold the press to account for daring to write about them. What if we put the subject’s disputes with an article to a completely neutral and objective adjudicator? Like, say, a chatbot:

Objection, a new technology platform founded by entrepreneur Aron D’Souza and backed by investors including Peter Thiel, has launched with an explicit mandate: to subject the media’s claims to systematic investigation and judgment by artificial intelligence.

… At the center of the platform sits what its creators call an AI tribunal. The tribunal is a ‘jury’ of the latest foundational reasoning models, instructed by a Judicial-Purpose Transformer (JPT).

Objection AI exists so rich guys can spin up quick counter-narratives to any bad press. Assuming they can get anyone to take their chatbot seriously. Grok, is this true?

The money is mostly coming from Peter Thiel and Balaji Srinivasan. Aron D’Souza and Thiel were the team that bankrupted the blog Gawker in 2016. They brag about this in the press release:

The Gawker litigation took ten years and millions of dollars. Objection industrializes this process.

That is: the stated goal of Objection AI is to destroy press outlets they don’t like.

Objection AI claims that it: [Objection AI]

gives everyone a fast, affordable, evidence-based way to dispute statements in the media.

If you want to file a dispute, it’ll cost you $2,000. That’s a lot of money for ordinary people — but it’s very fast and affordable for rich guys. [TechCrunch]

The way Objection AI works is that if you’re a reporter and you want to talk to one of these guys to ask him something, he’ll require you to sign up to arbitration by Objection AI — and be subject to any fines you might be charged by their pet chatbot.

Or you could not do that, because why on earth would you. You can just ask for comment in the standard manner, they demand you accept arbitration to get a quote from them, and you write that they refused to give any sort of normal and reasonable comment on the story. Hard Reset Media put it like this: [Hard Reset]

D’Souza is asking journalists to preemptively agree to the possibility of financial penalties set forth by an AI tribunal and/or the guy who helped bankrupt Gawker — all in exchange for an on-the-record interview with someone who is indicating they are paranoid and hoping to pick a fight.

These guys are rich, powerful, and sort of stupid. The same bunch of guys has long been trying to reinvent journalism from first principles — because, as centres of power, they don’t like adverse news coverage. What if we could neutralise that bit?

Balaji Srinivasan, one of Objection AI’s main backers, has been working on an idea like Objection for several years now.

Balaji’s plan as of 2020 was to do paid voting on facts — on a blockchain! You could pay in crypto to get more confirmations on a given fact!

Or you could use a prediction market to ascertain the facts! Of course, in 2026, we now know the use case for prediction markets is to do insider trading on war crimes.

Balaji was also wowed in 2020 by GPT-3. He thought it was definitely good enough to replace journalists: [Twitter, archive]

Next step is to generate sports reporting from box scores, financial reporting from ticker data, and movie reviews from captions.

As described, Balaji’s bot won’t do finance investigations. These guys would think that’s a feature — because they’re the financiers the stories would be about.

Objection AI is a clear statement of the precise thing the powerful rich guys are afraid of: reporting that stands up to them.

There is no reason for anyone to take Objection AI seriously in any way. These guys don’t understand journalism, because their whole knowledge of journalism is that they hate being the subjects of journalism. But that’s because they’re why journalism exists.

Read the whole story
TechnicallyGood
20 days ago
reply
Canada
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories